Osborne announces £100m for 'broadband cities'


LAST week George Osborne's latest declaration of economic doom had some good news for broadband users: £100 million for faster connections.

The Coalition's chief cashier earmarked the cash for building 10 'super connected' cities. Belfast, Cardiff, Edinburgh, London and six others will get a slice of the money.

But, as rural broadband speeds struggle to get to second-rate never mind super, many doubt that the chancellor is spending in the right place.

The dilemma: town or country?

The cash given to cities represents another slap in the face for rural areas Charles Trotman, CLBA's Head of Rural Business Development told PC Pro.

"You can see why the Government has done it," Trotman said, "but surely it's the case that rural areas that can't get reasonable broadband need that money - London and those other major cities already have, probably, suitable fibre networks."

Trotman's use of "probably" frames the debate neatly.

Slow urban broadband

Although the industry as a whole agrees that rural broadband needs huge investment, the truth is that the industry also knows that swathes of urban Britain aren't exactly superfast at the moment, it's just not that simple.

In addition, large scale investment in fibre broadband is necessary to ensure that the Government can meet its 90% commitment to superfast coverage and the most cost effective way to do that is to extend existing services such as BT fibre.

"Osborne's cash injection and 'connected cities' initiative gives a welcome boost to superfast broadband infrastructure in our major towns and cities," said Choose Editor Julia Kukiewicz.

"But it appears that a significant proportion of the £100 million will be handed over to BT and Virgin Media to boost their current superfast services, rather than create any substantial new fibre networks. That's a real shame for more rural areas."

In a similar way, some claim that the Government's emphasis on fibre disadvantages those getting online for the first time; in both cases, emphasising the top tier of users has a direct effect on those at the very bottom.

The bottom line

The bottom line matters since, according to some research, broadband is about to start playing a much larger part in households' lives.

Intellect, a group representing the technology industry in Britain, has said that it believes the UK could develop a connected home market worth up to £3 billion a year by 2020.

That would require a minimum broadband standard of 6Mb, however, significantly higher than the Government's current target of 2Mb.

Connected homes would combine superfast broadband connections with a single integrated home network.

That, Intellect claim, means they could act as "hi-tech hubs" allowing homeowners to do almost everything - from controlling energy use or accessing the latest information and entertainment services from the web - from anywhere, via tablets, internet connected TVs or smartphones.

"The devices and services which make up the connected home are either already available or being developed, so will ultimately arrive in everyone's home," said Intellect's Head of Internet and Media, Colin Batten.

"The challenge is to ensure people can get the most out of them by providing a joined up, robust network and not a piecemeal service, which would leave UK householders in the digital slow-lane."

Souped-up super cities

The £100 million will be split between the UK's four capitals with a further six cities allocated money after jumping through hoops and the like.

Speaking in the Commons, Osborne said the Government would, "help bring world-leading, superfast broadband and wifi connections".

The Chancellor's day may have been made a little brighter with the news that the potential for 4G mobile networks to push rural superfast was given a shot in the arm after Everything Everywhere said it was likely to offer two products to customers for its commercial 4G mobile broadband service.

A 2Mb service, coincidentally identical to the government's universal service commitment, and a 8Mb one are currently thought to be the most likely outcome of the trial taking place in Cornwall.

Readers are asked politely not to get too excited about the prospect, as it could be some time before we see the commercial launch of 4G mobile broadband services.

Ofcom's spectrum auction will have to come first.


7 June 2013
Peter Cooke

For those of us living in rural areas we must face a simple fact. Despite all the waffle from official sources we are never going to receive a broadband service other than the existing "tin cans and a length of string" technology that we currently have.
Legislation should be introduced that puts a cap on what suppliers are allowed to charge based on the ability to deliver.
My average Broadbad speed is 0.31 Mbps so should I pay the same as someone who has access to a 10Mbps?

7 June 2013
Choose team

We've considered the debate on whether you should pay less for poor speeds in this FAQ.

8 January 2013

I live in the scottish borders, in a rural area around 8 miles from the nearest town/anything. In the town they get up to 16Mbps download speeds while us outside the town are stuck at 0.4Mbps. We would simply love to be upgraded to 2Mbps. You can barely stream 240p on 0.4Mbps and I often find myself doing 150 hour downloads for games, which take people I know in the town only a few hours. We have even tried to contact BT about the community paying for the upgrade of the exchange, to speeds of around 2Mbps and we have been told that we cannot pay for it.

Please read our full disclaimer for important information that relates to the service we provide and your use of this site.

We aim to provide free reviews and comparisons of consumer products and to keep our editorial content as objective as possible. To keep the site free, we are paid by some providers when new customers take products after they've clicked on our links. We don't allow our editorial content to be affected by those links, however we may not include all of the products available in the market. Finally, we do not submit or process any applications for any products or services and we cannot guarantee that any product or service listed on this website will be available to you. Credit providers make the final decision on whether an application for credit will be accepted.

If you would like to get in touch with us you can contact us here.