Will I have to pay a dormancy fee if I don't use my credit card enough and how much will it be?
Dormancy fees, a nefarious charge that punishes cardholders for not using their cards, are relatively rare at the moment.
Most mainstream credit card providers no longer levy fees to customers who don't use their cards, or use them very infrequently, although the practice was widespread a few years ago, as you can see in the next section.
Having said that, however, dormancy fees are still well worth looking out for.
Santander issued store cards including Topshop and Debenhams cards still charge consumers for not making the most of their services, for example.
To double check any card's dormancy fees look in the summary box of any credit or store card under the main 'Charges' section.
Why charge dormancy fees?
Card companies claim that they issue dormancy fees to claw back some of the admin costs incurred when maintaining the account of an inactive credit card.
However, a spate of dormancy fees issued in 2007 (see below) coincided not at all coincidentally with a £12 cap on the amount that credit card companies could charge by way of fees imposed by regulators.
Prior to this many card issuers had been charging two or three times this amount.
The fee cap resulted in huge financial losses for credit card companies, and left many card issuers looking for other ways of making up for this lost revenue.
As a result, we saw interest rates, cash transaction charges and annual fees increased, the type of transactions that can be construed as cash transactions widened, and, of course, charging dormancy fees to customers that failed to use their credit cards regularly.
According to David Black of financial research firm Defaqto, "A mix of bad debt write-offs from customers, fraud, and costs of running empty accounts means margins are being squeezed for many card providers. Introducing dormancy fees is a way to cover this."
As we'll cover below, dormancy fees have since mostly been withdrawn but the reaction from financial services providers - finding alternative ways to increase charges as regulators attempt to cut costs for consumers - has since started repeating itself in the current account market.
Then
In 2007, Lloyds TSB were one of the first credit card providers to write to customers in 2007 informing them that low usage would incur charges.
The bank imposed a £35 dormancy fee across their entire range of credit cards, although it has since removed the fee.
Later on in 2007 Barclaycard deals imposed a similar charge.
Cardholders who'd not used their credit card in a one year period were likely to be charged the £20 fee, although the provider also imposed specified minimum spending and usage limits on their customers.
It is thought that around one million Barclaycard customers were affected by the new charge and that Barclaycard managed to net an extra twenty million pounds as a result of the change.
A spokesperson from Barclaycard said at the time: "We will do everything we can to improve the deal we give people, encourage them to use our card, not someone else's and avoid fees."
A £20 fee represents less than £2 a month, Barclaycard pointed out, although they also later cut the fee.
Similarly, Santander's own credit card range now no longer sports a dormancy fee in the summary box despite a brief flirtation with the idea.
Some American Express credit cards also introduced a £20 dormancy fee for customers who didn't spend on one of its cards for 12 months or more in October 2009.
The charge was levied, "if the aggregate amount of all transactions [on the account], other than cash advances & balance transfers, that have taken place during the preceding 12 months is £0."
However, Amex also subsequently withdrew the fee.
Now
Unless cardholders are notified otherwise, the credit card terms which apply to them are set out in the terms and conditions document they sign when they take the card.
For that reason, the above dormancy fees may still apply to some credit cardholders.
As always, checking the small print is essential in these situations: it's the only way to know definitively whether a dormancy fee will be charged on an inactive account.
However, for those signing up to a new card now only Santander issued store cards still charge a dormancy fee of £10.
The charge, which was introduced in December 2010 applies to all store cards supplied by the Spanish owned bank. That includes, but is not necessarily limited to the following, store cards from the following shops:
The fee is charged if the cardholder doesn't use their card within a six month period.
However, Santander should always give cardholders 30 days notice before charging a dormancy fee. At that point cardholders could choose to use the card or close the account to avoid the £10 fee, Santander say.
Send us your comments below and we'll add them to this page.
(Please read our comments disclaimer first though).
We need your email address in case we need to get in touch regarding your comment. We won't share your email address with anyone else and (unless you choose otherwise, e.g. by subscribing to our newsletter separately) we'll only use it for the purposes of contacting you regarding this comment.
Is there a dormancy fee with the House of Fraser recognition card (mastercard)? Do you know if this is with Santander and is it £10 if not used for 6 months?
At the time of writing, the House of Fraser store card is indeed issued by Santander and currently has a £10 dormancy fee.
If you are worried about debt or are experiencing any financial difficulties please contact an advice agency, such as the CCCS or National Debtline who will be able to offer free and impartial advice. You can also access free rights advice through Adviceguide from Citizen's Advice Bureau. We are not in any way connected to the CCCS, National Debtline or Citizen's Advice Bureau.
Please read our full disclaimer for important information that relates to the information and service we provide and your use of this site.
We aim to provide free reviews and comparisons of consumer products. To keep the site free, we are paid by some providers when new customers take products after they've clicked on our links. We don't allow our editorial content to be affected by those links, however we may not include all of the products available in the market.
If you would like to get in touch with us you can contact us here »
Let us know what you think and how we could improve.
Tell us your opinion or comments on facebook, twitter or
by sending in the form below:
This article made me:
What did you like most and what could we improve?
Anything you say here won't be made public. If you want to make a public comment, you can add it using the comments form at the end of the page.
If you've an idea for a topic or a story you think we should know about we'd love to hear from you. Find out more about contacting us and how you can get in touch here »